From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:31:20 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] ksensors ported to 3.x.x Message-Id: <47380F58.7090306@hhs.nl> List-Id: References: <473759E4.1070301@hhs.nl> In-Reply-To: <473759E4.1070301@hhs.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hans de Goede a =E9crit : >> Hi all, >> >> A tarbal with ksensors 0.7.3 ported to lm_sensors-3.x is available from: >> http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/Download >> >> Note, its a tarbal, since the patch I did is incremental to a lot of oth= er=20 >> patches as upstream has been dead for a while. >> >> If someone wants to see the last increment (the one adding lm_sensors-3x= =20 >> support) let me know. >> >=20 > I confirm that the upstream is dead, but I should still have CVS access > to the project. Would it be possible to send me the patch that adds > lm_sensors-3x support? I would also be interested by other patches. >=20 I'm afraid not, I can send a patch consisting of all Debian + Fedora fixes,= I=20 can even first send a patch with the Debian patches and then a few incremen= tal=20 patches with the Fedora fixes (including lm_sensors-3x support), porting th= e=20 lm_sensors-3x patch to CVS / 0.7.3 is not worth it IMHO, especially since m= ost=20 of the other fixes are very much worth their while. > BTW, if somebody is interested to continue upstream work, just ask me, I > think I have enough privileges on the sourceforce project to give CVS > access. Unfortunately I personally don't have time to work on that. >=20 I think that would be great, but alas I do not have the time, nor any=20 experience with QT / KDE. Thanks & Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors