From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: possibly a dumb question about sb600/700 Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:05:44 +0900 Message-ID: <47381768.2060803@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ro-out-1112.google.com ([72.14.202.180]:40883 "EHLO ro-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752484AbXKLJFw (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2007 04:05:52 -0500 Received: by ro-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p4so1369902roc for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 01:05:51 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: conke.hu@gmail.com Cc: IDE/ATA development list Hello, I've been looking at PATA support for sb600 and 700 and found something weird. * IDE atiixp.c has a separate entry for sb600 such that it only probes the first port but sb700 doesn't use the entry. So, does sb600 has one PATA channel but sb700 has two? * libata pata_atiixp.c doesn't have special handling for sb600's single-channeldness. Is this okay? Thanks. -- tejun