Re: [PATCH]3/5 Using kvm_arch prefix to define functions, and replace

[Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

Carsten Otte wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>   
>> For the present discussion, I agree, but in general we should be 
>> prepared to accept some no-op callouts.
>>     
>
> Oh sure, I don't mind those. We'll have plenty of them, where other 
> architectures will need to take action and s390 won't. It's just that 
> in the current location, the common code would do
>
> common_func() {
> 	loop {
> 		arch_callback();
> 	}
> }
> And I suggested to make the whole thing a callback.
>   

Ah, agreed.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/