From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Emelyanov Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: net 2.6.25 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:59:01 +0300 Message-ID: <473AD4F5.40505@openvz.org> References: <473AC169.1030202@sw.ru> <473ACE7F.5080007@fr.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <473ACE7F.5080007-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Daniel Lezcano , "Denis V. Lunev" Cc: Linux Containers , Benjamin Thery List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Denis V. Lunev wrote: >> Hello, guys! >> >> David has been opened net-2.6.25 tree yesterday, so we could send a new >> portion of NETNS there. If there are no objections, I'll send first six >> patches from OpenVZ GIT tomorrow, i.e. RTNL infrastructure, Packet & >> Unix sockets virtualization + some our /proc cleanups. > > Did Pavel had time to look at RCU looking mechanism to replace > rtnl_lock/rtnl_unlock to protect the netns list ? Unfortunately, I had not. Andrew has released the rc2-mm1 tree, so I'm now trying to prepare all the patches I wanted for this mm. I will revisit this problem, but Denis said, that the problem we're trying to solve with the RCU protection can be solved w/o it, no? > ps: isn't the openvz mailing list already subscribed to containers@ devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org is. > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org > https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >