From: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] lm-sensors-3.0.0 patch for (gnome) sensors-applet
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:52:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <473C16C1.7070104@hhs.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4738C247.4030501@hhs.nl>
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:08:48 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Jean Delvare wrote:
>>>> So, are you done with your porting work? If so, and if you didn't find
>>>> any problem with the new libsensors API, is there any reason to delay
>>>> the release of lm-sensors 3.0.0 any further?
>>> I'm not done with my porting work, next on the list is net-snmp,
>>> which looks easy to fix, I'll take a shot at it tomorrow. Then we
>>> also have an xfce applet
>>
>> I am interested in net-snmp as well, so maybe we can work on this
>> together. Well, you'll certainly be quicker than me on the code, but I
>> can review your patch and push it in opensuse.
>>
>
> Hmm,
>
> While coordinating my work with the Fedora net-snmp maintainer I got
> attended that upstream us already working on this:
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name®77C0A0A0DC9B49BAA800A119E82EA207CD5D83%40EDM-GOA-EXCC-1A.goa.ds.gov.ab.ca
>
>
> However the upstream work is a complete rewrite of the sensors code in
> net-snmp, as I have no idea when that will be stable and I don't want to
> completely break the development branch of Fedora (quite a few things
> require net-snmp) I'll also be writing a patch against the current
> stable net-snmp release, I already took a look and the code is quite
> isolated, fixing this for the current stable net-snmp release should be
> quite easy.
>
Ok,
Scrap that, upstream has finished lm_sensors-3.x support and the Fedora
net-snmp maintainer has decided to backport the sensors infra changes +
lm_sensors-3.x.x support to the current stable net-snmp, patch available here:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/devel/net-snmp/net-snmp-5.4.1-sensors3.patch?rev=1.1
Shall I add this to the wiki? Its a bit intrusive.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-15 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-12 21:14 [lm-sensors] lm-sensors-3.0.0 patch for (gnome) sensors-applet Hans de Goede
2007-11-13 21:02 ` Jean Delvare
2007-11-13 21:08 ` Hans de Goede
2007-11-13 21:56 ` Jean Delvare
2007-11-14 10:18 ` Hans de Goede
2007-11-15 9:52 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2007-11-18 14:26 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=473C16C1.7070104@hhs.nl \
--to=j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.