From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: CONFIG_NETFILTER_ADVANCED Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:14:36 +0100 Message-ID: <473F136C.80207@trash.net> References: <20071116.044413.227110480.davem@davemloft.net> <473D91E9.4010809@trash.net> <20071116153541.GA25986@linuxace.com> <20071116.161926.00949588.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kernel@linuxace.com, jengelh@computergmbh.de, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:44254 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755546AbXKQQPL (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Nov 2007 11:15:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20071116.161926.00949588.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > From: Phil Oester > Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:35:41 -0800 > > >> I'd vote for at least FTP here...most users will use it at >> some point (or if they don't, wonder why FTP is broken). >> > > I disagree, passive ftp is extremely pervasive, there is no reason to > use traditional ftp these days. I'd expect that many distribution scripts load it anyway, and IMO the point of this config option is to support basic distribution scripts without going through all the options manually. There must be someone on this list not running Debian or Ubuntu :) Could some RH/Fedora/Suse user please post the output of lsmod on his system?