From: Anthony Liguori <anthony-rdkfGonbjUSkNkDKm+mE6A@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Ryden <markryde-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: para virtualized kvm virtio drivers and performance comparing to Xen
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:55:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4740606D.4050401@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dac45060711180516l501b2cfaq8999589a798e0739-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Mark Ryden wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I saw in this mailing list (kvm-devel) that there is a git tree
> which uses Rusty Russel virtio API. The intention that this tree will be
> integrated inot mainstream in the near future.
>
> (for example,
> http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org/msg08854.html).
>
> My question is about performance of these virtio para virtualized
> drivers (I am talking mainly about network and disk drivers):
> How this is in comparison with the paravirtualized drivers of Xen
> (the split devices model)?
>
Optimization is still ongoing. I'm pretty confident that the linux-aio
based disk driver is at least as good. The RX side of the network
driver is also pretty decent (I can get 1.5 gbit/sec). I think over
time we'll be able to get a fair bit more without even going to
kernel-space. Once we have a kernel space backend, I think we'll get
performance that's at least as good as Xen's drivers.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> I am talking about Xen in its paravirtualized mode, where the
> guests run unmodified OSes (on ordinary, non virtualized processors).
>
> Is the performance about the same as the Xen paravirtualized drivers ?
>
> In case is it so, can we see kvm a competitor to Xen in server virtualization
> (when we deal with a high loads of thousands/ten of thousands of
> interrupts per second).?
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> kvm-devel mailing list
> kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-18 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-18 13:16 para virtualized kvm virtio drivers and performance comparing to Xen Mark Ryden
[not found] ` <dac45060711180516l501b2cfaq8999589a798e0739-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2007-11-18 15:55 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4740606D.4050401@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony-rdkfgonbjusknkdkm+me6a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=markryde-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.