From: Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za>
To: Eric Leblond <eric@inl.fr>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nlif_index2name bug?
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:55:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <474098A0.8070607@uls.co.za> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47408E64.8060901@uls.co.za>
Jaco Kroon wrote:
> Eric Leblond wrote:
>
>> I've just wrote a brief nlif documentation on the following page:
>> http://software.inl.fr/trac/trac.cgi/wiki/articles/using_nlif
>>
>>
> This explains things quite a bit. Very nicely done.
>
> I'm actually using libnetfilter_queue, and am not doing anything
> multi-threaded, would it be sufficient just to call nlif_catch() every
> time I run into an interface for which there is no name and to then
> retry the call? Alternatively, you mention select(), I'm guessing the
> poll() system call will achieve the same thing? My reasoning here is
> that everytime just before calling nlif_index2name() to first call
> poll() with a timeout of zero in order to check whether there are
> updates and to then call nlif_catch if there are updates, however, is
> this the most efficient way, since poll() and nlif_catch() both probably
> results in a system call, wouldn't it simply be more efficient to just
> call nlif_catch every time just before calling nlif_index2name?
>
> Also, in the case of poll(), I guess I need to poll for POLLIN?
>
Ok, so after testing it turns out poll(2) does work quite nicely,
however, I need to call nlif_catch quite a few times to get things to
work nicely, so now I've basically got this piece of code just before
nlif_index2name():
while (poll(&nlif_poll, 1, 0) > 0) {
log (LOG_INFO, "Calling nlif_catch due to device changes.");
nlif_catch(nlif);
}
And it turns out that simply restarting ppp0 causes quite a few events:
[INFO]: Calling nlif_catch due to device changes.
[INFO]: Calling nlif_catch due to device changes.
[INFO]: Calling nlif_catch due to device changes.
[INFO]: Calling nlif_catch due to device changes.
[INFO]: Calling nlif_catch due to device changes.
[INFO]: Calling nlif_catch due to device changes.
[INFO]: Calling nlif_catch due to device changes.
[INFO]: Calling nlif_catch due to device changes.
[INFO]: Calling nlif_catch due to device changes.
[INFO]: Calling nlif_catch due to device changes.
[INFO]: Calling nlif_catch due to device changes.
[INFO]: Calling nlif_catch due to device changes.
[INFO]: Calling nlif_catch due to device changes.
[INFO]: Calling nlif_catch due to device changes.
[INFO]: Setting device ppp0(9) to cap 2.
Not sure what's causing all those events but it works correctly now, thanks.
Jaco
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-18 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-17 12:53 nlif_index2name bug? Jaco Kroon
2007-11-18 18:35 ` Eric Leblond
2007-11-18 19:11 ` Jaco Kroon
2007-11-18 19:55 ` Jaco Kroon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=474098A0.8070607@uls.co.za \
--to=jaco@uls.co.za \
--cc=eric@inl.fr \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.