From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make netns cleanup to run in a separate workq
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:44:44 +0100
Message-ID: <47415B0C.4080507@fr.ibm.com>
References: <4741583F.3050302@fr.ibm.com> <47415B60.4060306@sw.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <47415B60.4060306-3ImXcnM4P+0@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers>,
	<mailto:containers-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers>
List-Post: <mailto:containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:containers-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers>,
	<mailto:containers-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
To: "Denis V. Lunev" <den-3ImXcnM4P+0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org>, "Denis V. Lunev" <den-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>, Pavel Emelianov <xemul-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org

Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> 
> Acked-by: Denis V. Lunev <den-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> 
> Though, could you insert original problem description into the comment?
> This change is not obvious one?

Sure.

thanks.