From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stas Sergeev Subject: Re: rate plugin issue Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:09:12 +0300 Message-ID: <4741FB78.8040302@aknet.ru> References: <4738A89D.9060601@aknet.ru> <473B561A.1050203@aknet.ru> <473F01E9.8070907@aknet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.aknet.ru (mail.AKNET.ru [77.246.241.226]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CFB24917 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:08:13 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi. Takashi Iwai wrote: > Changing period_size isn't allowed arbitrarilly because it's a > hardware constraint. OTOH, avail_min is the software parameter. > So avail_min > period_size makes sense in some cases. > In my patch I disallowed the case avail_min < period_size because it > doesn't work *practically*. OK, I see, thank you. Now it seems the patch is still not applied. Just to make sure, is it because you are still waiting for the test-case, or just haven't got around to apply it yet? I am asking to make sure that I am not responsible for the delay. :)