From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:28:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47427076.7030702@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711201624.32611.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 November 2007 15:37, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 05:29:29AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
>>> Agreed. When userspace has something to do with the way IRQs are
>>> delivered, it's going to smell as bad as micro-kernels...
>> The next step to a micro-kernel would then be hardware drivers and file
>> systems in userspace? ;-)
>
> We already have those. So the next step would be to pretend the
> performance critical ones can be in userspace and remain competitive,
> wouldn't it? ;)
Hey, I have a great idea... we can create a microkernel^W hypervisor and
make a single process^W domain do all the I/O...
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-20 5:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-20 4:12 CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ? Mark Lord
2007-11-20 4:15 ` Ismail Dönmez
2007-11-20 4:17 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-20 4:29 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-11-20 4:37 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-20 5:24 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-20 5:28 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2007-11-20 5:37 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-11-20 7:37 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-20 14:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-11-20 15:43 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-20 19:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-11-20 20:02 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-20 21:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-11-20 23:17 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-22 7:54 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-23 13:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-25 10:03 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-20 15:47 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-20 15:52 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-20 16:02 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-11-20 16:10 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-20 18:42 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-20 22:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 23:22 ` Mark Lord
2007-11-20 23:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 23:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-20 23:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 23:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-21 0:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-21 0:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-21 0:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-21 0:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-21 2:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-11-21 2:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-20 23:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-20 19:17 ` Andi Kleen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-21 2:22 Walt H
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47427076.7030702@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.