From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [209.85.146.176] (helo=wa-out-1112.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IunqK-0002LX-Qs for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:34:09 +0100 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id l24so3035078waf for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 03:31:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.204.7 with SMTP id b7mr123357wag.1195640782482; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:26:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.204? ( [24.107.180.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm98026nzn.2007.11.21.02.26.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:26:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <474407BF.1000305@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 04:26:07 -0600 From: Junqian Gordon Xu User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071020) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1195552013.6337.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1195577527.6337.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1195577527.6337.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> Subject: Re: Host dependency vs. -native packages balance X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:34:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/20/2007 10:52 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 12:18 +0100, Esben Haabendal wrote: >> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:46:53 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 07:36 +0100, Esben Haabendal wrote: >>>> Not having looked at the details of this bug, it seems like a good >>>> example of how more host dependency creep into OE. >>>> >>>> I think it raises two questions: >>>> >>>> 1. Where do we want the balance between dependency on host installed >>>> libraries and tools vs. OE provided -native packages? >>>> >>>> 2. How can we better handle or track the actual host dependency of >>>> current OE? >>>> >>>> The current situation is that some (maybe even most) host dependencies >>>> are discussed on the RequiredSoftware and OEandYourDistro pages. They >>>> are clearly not up-to-date and comments in bugzilla such as the one >>>> below are a bit harder to find. >>> Dependencies needed from the host system are those listed in >>> ASSUME_PROVIDED. If its not listed in ASSUME_PROVIDED, OE shouldn't need >>> it. If it needs something not listed, that is a bug. >> Why are we then closing bugs with arguments such as "just install XXX on your host"? > > They shouldn't be being closed with that IMO... I apologize for closing that bug prematurely. I updated the OEandYourDistro->Debian/Ubuntu part in the wiki. Gordon