From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tore Anderson Subject: Re: order of preference / multipath.conf Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:14:53 +0100 Message-ID: <4744597D.1050402@linpro.no> References: <940B4FF1F5958E4F96FC83C055A2F2611B8C9D@exch-2003.incipient.waltham> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <940B4FF1F5958E4F96FC83C055A2F2611B8C9D@exch-2003.incipient.waltham> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: device-mapper development List-Id: dm-devel.ids * Paul Cote > Is the following order of preference accurate? > > > 1) Multipaths section (in /etc/multipath.conf) > 2) Device section (in /etc/multipath.conf) > 3) Defaults section (in /etc/multipath.conf) > 4) Internal default (hwtable.c) I think maybe that number 3 and 4 is swapped, but don't take my word for it. It should be easy to do some tests and figure it out for yourself by using the "show config" command inside the "multipathd -k" shell with a few different configuration files. Regards -- Tore Anderson