From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [64.233.166.183] (helo=py-out-1112.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Iv3QC-0000DJ-85 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 05:12:12 +0100 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a25so8700647pyi for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:09:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.78.9 with SMTP id f9mr9748807pyl.1195697578919; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:12:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.204? ( [24.107.180.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p77sm559196pyb.2007.11.21.18.12.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:12:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4744E5AB.4040400@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:12:59 -0600 From: Junqian Gordon Xu User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071020) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4743FB40.1030307@gmail.com> <200711211347.58538.openembedded@haerwu.biz> In-Reply-To: <200711211347.58538.openembedded@haerwu.biz> Subject: Re: gfortran needed on host to compile gcc >= 4.1.2 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 04:12:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 11/21/2007 06:47 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Dnia środa, 21 listopada 2007, Junqian Gordon Xu napisał: >> I took the liberty to enable gfortran for gcc_4.1.2 (hence gcc >= 4.1.2 >> has fortran enabled). The side effect is that you need to install >> gfortran or g77 on your host to compile it. > > Can I still build gcc(-cross) without gfortran when gfortran is not > installed on host? If not they I would call it ugly regression... I'm afraid you will get stuck in do_configure of gcc(-cross). I assume the burden of installing gfortran on the host is low. But people may disagree. Maybe we could introduce a fortran flag in a conf files, if there is too much opposition to the change. Regards Gordon