From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, devel@openvz.org
Subject: [PATCH][UNIX] Move the unix sock iterators in to proper place
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:22:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47458296.60908@openvz.org> (raw)
The first_unix_socket() and next_unix_sockets() are now used
in proc file and in forall_unix_socets macro only.
The forall_unix_sockets is not used in this file at all so
remove it. After this move the helpers to where they really
belong, i.e. closer to proc code under the #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
option.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
---
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 6be6d87..b62a271 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -127,32 +127,6 @@ static atomic_t unix_nr_socks = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
#define UNIX_ABSTRACT(sk) (unix_sk(sk)->addr->hash != UNIX_HASH_SIZE)
-static struct sock *first_unix_socket(int *i)
-{
- for (*i = 0; *i <= UNIX_HASH_SIZE; (*i)++) {
- if (!hlist_empty(&unix_socket_table[*i]))
- return __sk_head(&unix_socket_table[*i]);
- }
- return NULL;
-}
-
-static struct sock *next_unix_socket(int *i, struct sock *s)
-{
- struct sock *next = sk_next(s);
- /* More in this chain? */
- if (next)
- return next;
- /* Look for next non-empty chain. */
- for ((*i)++; *i <= UNIX_HASH_SIZE; (*i)++) {
- if (!hlist_empty(&unix_socket_table[*i]))
- return __sk_head(&unix_socket_table[*i]);
- }
- return NULL;
-}
-
-#define forall_unix_sockets(i, s) \
- for (s = first_unix_socket(&(i)); s; s = next_unix_socket(&(i),(s)))
-
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK
static void unix_get_secdata(struct scm_cookie *scm, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
@@ -2010,6 +1984,29 @@ static unsigned int unix_poll(struct file * file, struct socket *sock, poll_tabl
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
+static struct sock *first_unix_socket(int *i)
+{
+ for (*i = 0; *i <= UNIX_HASH_SIZE; (*i)++) {
+ if (!hlist_empty(&unix_socket_table[*i]))
+ return __sk_head(&unix_socket_table[*i]);
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static struct sock *next_unix_socket(int *i, struct sock *s)
+{
+ struct sock *next = sk_next(s);
+ /* More in this chain? */
+ if (next)
+ return next;
+ /* Look for next non-empty chain. */
+ for ((*i)++; *i <= UNIX_HASH_SIZE; (*i)++) {
+ if (!hlist_empty(&unix_socket_table[*i]))
+ return __sk_head(&unix_socket_table[*i]);
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
struct unix_iter_state {
struct seq_net_private p;
int i;
next reply other threads:[~2007-11-22 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-22 13:22 Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2007-11-23 12:30 ` [PATCH][UNIX] Move the unix sock iterators in to proper place Herbert Xu
2007-11-23 13:10 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2007-11-23 13:37 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47458296.60908@openvz.org \
--to=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.