From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>, RTE <raszilki@yandex.ru>,
SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-usb-users] Read errors on Flash Drive Transcend TS1GJF2A
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:55:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <474AEC59.9050805@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0711261034090.4250-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Mon, Nov 26 2007 at 17:35 +0200, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Not all devices correctly report the error-causing LBA in the
> Information field of their sense data -- even when they set the Valid
> bit. This patch (as1019) makes sd much more cautious about accepting
> the reported LBA. If the value isn't within the range of blocks
> accessed during the I/O operation it is rejected, and instead the
> driver will try looking at the residue field (which currently it
> ignores completely).
>
> This fixes a data-corruption bug reported here:
>
> http://marc.info/?t=118745764700005&r=1&w=2
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> CC: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>
>
> ---
>
> This patch should be considered for inclusion in 2.6.24. The bug in
> question has always existed, as far as I know, but before 2.6.18 it was
> masked by a different bug.
>
> This doesn't use the new SCSI accessors. In the development trees
> I've seen, those accessors haven't yet been imported into sd.c. If
> the patch needs to be rebased, please let me know where to find the
> current sd source.
>
It's currently only in mm patchset has:
bidi-support-sr-sd-remove-dead-code.patch
&&
bidi-support-scsi_data_buffer.patch
> Presumably sr should use the same algorithm. That's grist for another
> patch.
>
>
> Index: usb-2.6/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> ===================================================================
> --- usb-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ usb-2.6/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -968,7 +968,17 @@ static int sd_done(struct scsi_cmnd *SCp
<snip>
If this is a bugfix for 2.6.24 than I will be the one to rebase,
as scsi_data_buffer is only for 2.6.25, I hope ;)
Andrew once above goes into scsi-rc-fixes or scsi-misc I will send
a rebase, if I've fallen asleep please bang me on the head, thanks.
Alen thanks for doing this It was on my must-investigate list.
(Though I'm usually not using sd)
Boaz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-26 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <op.t2a0x7tige0nj0@smtp.mail.yandex.ru>
2007-11-26 15:35 ` [Linux-usb-users] Read errors on Flash Drive Transcend TS1GJF2A Alan Stern
2007-11-26 15:55 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2007-12-04 17:35 ` Boaz Harrosh
2007-12-04 18:03 ` Alan Stern
2007-12-05 9:04 ` Boaz Harrosh
2007-12-05 17:36 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=474AEC59.9050805@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltuikov@yahoo.com \
--cc=raszilki@yandex.ru \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.