From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw01.freescale.net (az33egw01.freescale.net [192.88.158.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw01.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DF2DDE0C for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:40:58 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <474B3D7F.8060503@freescale.com> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:41:19 -0600 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vitaly Bordug Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] powerpc: Move CPM command handling into the cpm drivers References: <4745BB5F.6060002@scram.de> <20071123005121.4d38d877@kernel.crashing.org> <20071126162446.GA4408@loki.buserror.net> <20071127002249.612f4ff6@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <20071127002249.612f4ff6@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Vitaly Bordug wrote: > perhaps I was not clear enough. That was a rough idea how to handle > the whole thing, not just cpm_cr_cmd. This cpm command is a corner > case, but there can be other actions that may confuse CPM being > triggered simultaneously or overlapping. What kind of actions did you have in mind? Microcode patching? -Scott