All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fabien Chevalier <fabchevalier@free.fr>
To: BlueZ development <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] [PATCH] Bluez exceptions refactoring updated patch
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:01:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <474FD172.3090109@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1196196897.17196.56.camel@aeonflux>


Hi Marcel,

> 
> and the origin is from the other error.[ch] files. So the copyright
> still prevails. Copying content from one file to another one doesn't
> change the copyright.

If this is the case i should have a couple of copyrights in the 
pcm_bluetooth and ctl_bluetooth files, as if i remember well they both 
started as a copy& past from plugz project ;-)
I will surely send a patch to fix that one of those days.

>  
>>> It is great that you added comments for each function, but they belong
>>> inside the *.c files. The rule is that they should be placed where the
>>> actual function body is defined.
>> Marcel, i don't know where from you got this idea, but i find it pretty 
>> dumb. The whole point in having the documentation in the header file is 
>> that as a user of a function you're not interested in how it works (the 
>> c file), but what it does, which is what the documentation is for.
>>
>> I don't know of *any* project that has it's function level documentation 
>> in the C files.
>> But there are numerous counter-examples:
>>    - The Linux Kernel (have a look at the USB stack file 
>> include/linux/usb.h for instance).
> 
> And check drivers/usb/core/urb.c for another example. The documentation
> comment are not for reading the *.h. They are for creating automated API
> documentation. The that structs are document in the header file is
> right, because they are defined there. The actual function are defined
> in the *.c files and thus the comment belongs there.
> 

If you wish to follow kernel documenting style, then so be it. We're 
clearly sitting in the minority side however ;-)

Cheers,

Fabien

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-30  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-25 21:32 [PATCH] Bluez exceptions refactoring updated patch Fabien Chevalier
2007-11-26  5:47 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2007-11-26 16:12   ` Fabien Chevalier
2007-11-27 20:54     ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2007-11-30  9:01       ` Fabien Chevalier [this message]
2007-11-30  9:41         ` Marcel Holtmann
2007-11-26 14:12 ` Johan Hedberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=474FD172.3090109@free.fr \
    --to=fabchevalier@free.fr \
    --cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=johan.hedberg@nokia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.