From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [212.60.202.196] (helo=mail.kernelconcepts.de) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IyA4u-0006iX-Sd for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:55:04 +0100 Received: from [192.168.2.163] by mail.kernelconcepts.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IyAMS-00050A-VI for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:13:12 +0100 Message-ID: <47504DBB.8020604@kernelconcepts.de> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:51:55 +0100 From: Florian Boor User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <20071129172123.GA29463@buddha.tw.openmoko.com> <474F1835.6060002@student.utwente.nl> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Subject: Re: Firewall blocking access to monotone server? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:55:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Tiller, Jason schrieb: > I'm running on a 400MHz P-III with 256MB of memory running RHEL 4. The OS is > mandated by my IT guys. I got everything down, finally got everything built > (well, so far), including git, svn, mtn, boost, (1.33.1), bb, and a whole > host of other packages. My poor little box has been compiling its little > brains out. I think I have everything in place. Oh dear... RHEL4 is quite common, but compiling on this hardware will be a major pain. I could donate an faster PC to your company if you like ;-) > If I were to go to my IT guys and ask them (nicely) to help me out, what do I > need to tell them in terms of the port/protocol issues? I'll need to > convince them that this is a safe proposition, but I'm sure exactly what I'm > asking for. Well since that's an outgoing connection on a single, defined port there is really not much risk in opening it. If they are really crazy and do not want to allow external connections they could provide a SOCKS proxy you could use with tsocks. Greetings Florian -- The dream of yesterday Florian Boor is the hope of today Tel: +49 271-771091-15 and the reality of tomorrow. Fax: +49 271-771091-19 [Robert Hutchings Goddard, 1904] florian.boor@kernelconcepts.de 1D78 2D4D 6C53 1CA4 5588 D07B A8E7 940C 25B7 9A76