From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid overflows in kernel/time.c
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:19:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4750E0D7.9060402@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071201003333.GR29463@stusta.de>
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> I have read the hep text, but are the advantages of HZ == 300 really
> visible or was this more theoretical?
>
> In the latter case, we might remove the HZ == 300 choice instead.
>
Well, we have, for various architectures:
HZ == 48, 100, 128, 250, 256, 300, 1000, 1024
You'd have to kill 48, 128, 256, 300 and 1024.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-01 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-30 0:19 [PATCH] Avoid overflows in kernel/time.c H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-30 1:54 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-30 3:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-30 3:27 ` [PATCH] Documentation/Changes -> Documentation/Requirements H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-30 3:32 ` [PATCH] Documentation/Changes -> Documentation/Requirements (resend without truncated comment text) H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-30 7:16 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-11-30 17:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-30 17:47 ` [PATCH] Documentation/Changes -> Documentation/Requirements H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-30 18:09 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-11-30 18:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-30 1:59 ` [PATCH] Avoid overflows in kernel/time.c Chris Snook
2007-11-30 3:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-11-30 3:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-11-30 3:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-02 18:37 ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-03 14:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-12-10 16:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-01 0:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-01 4:19 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2007-12-01 13:20 ` Alan Cox
2007-12-01 13:33 ` Alan Cox
2007-12-02 1:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-07 0:22 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-12-04 11:29 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-10 16:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-10 18:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-10 22:04 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4750E0D7.9060402@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.