From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wendy Cheng Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 21:51:41 -0500 Subject: [Cluster-devel] cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs inode.c ops_file.c ... In-Reply-To: <4750DE3C.5090004@ubuntu.com> References: <20071130214855.29208.qmail@sourceware.org> <4750DE3C.5090004@ubuntu.com> Message-ID: <47521DBD.30201@redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: >wcheng at sourceware.org wrote: > > >>CVSROOT: /cvs/cluster >>Module name: cluster >>Branch: RHEL5 >>Changes by: wcheng at sourceware.org 2007-11-30 21:48:54 >> >>Modified files: >> gfs-kernel/src/gfs: inode.c ops_file.c ops_file.h >> >>Log message: >> Red Hat bugzilla 244343: >> >> GFS supports two modes of locking - lock_nolock for single node filesystem >> and lock_dlm for cluster mode locking. The gfs lock methods are removed from >> file operation table for lock_nolock protocol. This would allow VFS to handle >> posix lock and flock logics just like other in-tree filesystems without >> duplication. >> >>Patches: >>http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs/inode.c.diff?cvsroot=cluster&only_with_tag=RHEL5&r1=1.26&r2=1.26.2.1 >>http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs/ops_file.c.diff?cvsroot=cluster&only_with_tag=RHEL5&r1=1.28.2.2&r2=1.28.2.3 >>http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs/ops_file.h.diff?cvsroot=cluster&only_with_tag=RHEL5&r1=1.2&r2=1.2.2.1 >> >> >> > > >Should this patch land in HEAD as well? > > > > Yes .. but gfs(1)-kernel HEAD is currently broken .. Will review few proposed patches (including your NFS patches) and do a clean-up first thing next week. -- Wendy