Re: [PATCH] mempool:Add monitor dump for memory pool

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>]

01/01/2023 12:28, Morten Brørup:
> > From: wushaohua@chinatelecom.cn [mailto:wushaohua@chinatelecom.cn]
> > Sent: Sunday, 1 January 2023 06.18
> > 
> > From: Shaohua Wu <wushaohua@chinatelecom.cn>
> > 
> > rte_mempool_dump add dump for monitoring available and
> > used memory blocks
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Wu <wushaohua@chinatelecom.cn>
> > ---
> >  lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> > index f33f455790..09d512a604 100644
> > --- a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> > +++ b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> > @@ -1265,9 +1265,14 @@ rte_mempool_dump(FILE *f, struct rte_mempool
> > *mp)
> > 
> >  	cache_count = rte_mempool_dump_cache(f, mp);
> >  	common_count = rte_mempool_ops_get_count(mp);
> > +
> >  	if ((cache_count + common_count) > mp->size)
> >  		common_count = mp->size - cache_count;
> >  	fprintf(f, "  common_pool_count=%u\n", common_count);
> > +	fprintf(f, "  common_pool_avail_count=%u\n",
> > +				rte_mempool_avail_count(mp));
> 
> The number of available objects in the common pool is already shown as "common_pool_count".
> 
> If you want to show the total number of available objects in both the common pool and the caches, you can calculate is as common_count + cache_count, instead of calling rte_mempool_avail_count(). And "total_count" would be a better name than "common_pool_avail_count".
> 
> > +	fprintf(f, "  common_pool_used_count=%u\n",
> > +				rte_mempool_in_use_count(mp));
> 
> common_pool_used_count can be calculated as mp->size - common_count, instead of calling rte_mempool_in_use_count(mp).


No reply...
I assume it is a rejected patch.