From: John Sigler <linux.kernel@free.fr>
To: Dick Johnson <linux-os@analogic.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: Is the PCI clock within the spec?
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:12:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47556E48.40703@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0712040839250.8751@chaos.analogic.com>
Dick Johnson wrote:
> You can't just touch a scope-probe to the PCI
> clock pin and clip the scope-probe grounding
> lead to a convenient "ground" to make these
> measurements! You need a special fixture that
> will make a low-inductance connection to the
> PCI bus in the same manner as the interface chip.
(This is waaay over my head.)
Why do you think the two plots (at least the second one)
were not obtained as you describe?
Why would the system manufacturer botch the measurements
when I asked them to show me evidence that their system
was compliant?
> A scope probe will allow you to see if there is
> a clock signal. That's all. You can't determine
> its quality. A 4-inch ground lead on the scope
> probe will result in 10-20% overshoot and undershoot
> being observed.
I don't understand this 10-20% figure.
(0V + 10-20% is still 0V.)
AFAIU, the nominal peak-to-peak voltage is 3.3V. The observed
peak-to-peak voltage is 6.08V (3.3V + 84%).
Regards.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-04 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-04 10:57 Is the PCI clock within the spec? John Sigler
2007-12-04 12:42 ` Sébastien Dugué
2007-12-04 13:27 ` John Sigler
2007-12-04 13:48 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007-12-04 15:12 ` John Sigler [this message]
2007-12-04 15:51 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007-12-04 21:37 ` David Schwartz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47556E48.40703@free.fr \
--to=linux.kernel@free.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.