From: John Reiser <jreiser@BitWagon.com>
To: uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [uml-devel] should there be os_clone() analogous to os_getpid() ?
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:24:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <475B6E19.6040200@BitWagon.com> (raw)
In source file arch/um/os-Linux/process.c there is a warning:
-----
/* Don't use the glibc version, which caches the result in TLS. It misses some
* syscalls, and also breaks with clone(), which does not unshare the TLS.
*/
int os_getpid(void)
-----
I see no os_clone(), yet the glibc clone() does the same caching of pid in
ThreadLocalStorage [TLS], and the TLS still may be shared. If nobody reads
glibc's shared TLS slot for PID then an actual bug will be avoided. However,
it is unsafe to leave such a tempting pitfall. Also, if you are ptrace()ing
through a glibc clone(), then in many cases you will see syscall(__NR_getpid)
*from glibc* immediately following! There is an "extra" getpid()
that the tracking logic might not expect. So it seems to me that
there should be an os_clone() that refrains from fiddling with getpid.
[Unfortunately os_clone() is not so simple as os_getpid().]
The clone() we're talking about here is _not_ the bare syscall:
-----
_syscall5(int, clone, int, flags, void *, child_stack,
int *, parent_tidptr, struct user_desc *, newtls,
int *, child_tidptr)
-----
but rather the C-language interface:
-----
int clone(int (*fn)(void *), void *child_stack,
int flags, void *arg, ...
/* pid_t *pid, struct user_desc *tls, pid_t *ctid */ );
-----
which is declared in arch/um/include/kern.h and referenced in
arch/um/drivers/ubd_user.c
arch/um/kernel/tt/tracer.c
arch/um/os/tt.c
arch/um/os/start_up.c
arch/um/os/skas/process.c
This clone() is implemented by glibc, and at runtime lives in the shared
library /lib/libc.so.6.
Not only that, but some versions of glibc for x86 use "int $0x80" directly
only for the __NR_clone call. They use "ENTER_KERNEL" for the getpid(),
which in some cases (such as Fedora 7 and 8, but not Ubuntu 7.04) expands to
"call *%gs:nnnnn" which points at "sysenter; ret".
--
John Reiser, jreiser@BitWagon.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next reply other threads:[~2007-12-09 4:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-09 4:24 John Reiser [this message]
2007-12-09 15:10 ` [uml-devel] should there be os_clone() analogous to os_getpid() ? Jeff Dike
2007-12-09 20:58 ` John Reiser
2007-12-10 17:09 ` Jeff Dike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=475B6E19.6040200@BitWagon.com \
--to=jreiser@bitwagon.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.