From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [FW: FYI: The plan for Xen kernels in Fedora 9] Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:36:05 -0800 Message-ID: <475DE985.9040603@goop.org> References: <20071210152025.GF12703@redhat.com><1197306414.12267.23.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com> <475DDB9A.30300@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Tian, Kevin" Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "Daniel P. Berrange" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Tian, Kevin wrote: > Or take a neutral one like CONFIG_XEN_PRIV? Why is that an improvement? I could see a finer grain config to do driver domains, perhaps, but it doesn't seem worthwhile at this point. But it might be useful to have some marker of which code is necessary for Dom0 functionality, and which is core Xen support. J