From: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
To: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, containers@lists.osdl.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.25] netns: struct net content re-work (v2)
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:57:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <475E5F12.10900@fr.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071211074504.GA8334@iris.sw.ru>
Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> Recently David Miller and Herbert Xu pointed out that struct net becomes
> overbloated and un-maintainable. There are two solutions:
> - provide a pointer to a network subsystem definition from struct net.
> This costs an additional dereferrence
> - place sub-system definition into the structure itself. This will speedup
> run-time access at the cost of recompilation time
>
> The second approach looks better for us. Other sub-systems will be converted
> to this approach if this will be accepted :)
>
> Changes from v1:
> - renamed fields according to Daniel Lezcano suggestion
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/net/net_namespace.h | 5 +++--
> net/unix/af_unix.c | 4 ++--
> net/unix/sysctl_net_unix.c | 12 ++++++------
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/net_namespace.h b/include/net/net_namespace.h
> --- a/include/net/net_namespace.h
> +++ b/include/net/net_namespace.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> #include <linux/list.h>
>
> +#include <net/netns/unix.h>
> +
> struct proc_dir_entry;
> struct net_device;
> struct sock;
> @@ -46,8 +48,7 @@ struct net {
> struct hlist_head packet_sklist;
>
> /* unix sockets */
> - int sysctl_unix_max_dgram_qlen;
> - struct ctl_table_header *unix_ctl;
> + struct netns_unix unx;
> };
"unx" looks really weird for me. But anyway it is a cosmetic issue, not
very important. Just in case you change your mind, two suggestions for
the name :)
struct netns_unix netns_unix;
struct netns_unix af_unix;
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET
> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static struct sock * unix_create1(struct net *net, struct socket *sock)
> &af_unix_sk_receive_queue_lock_key);
>
> sk->sk_write_space = unix_write_space;
> - sk->sk_max_ack_backlog = net->sysctl_unix_max_dgram_qlen;
> + sk->sk_max_ack_backlog = net->unx.sysctl_max_dgram_qlen;
> sk->sk_destruct = unix_sock_destructor;
> u = unix_sk(sk);
> u->dentry = NULL;
> @@ -2138,7 +2138,7 @@ static int unix_net_init(struct net *net)
> {
> int error = -ENOMEM;
>
> - net->sysctl_unix_max_dgram_qlen = 10;
> + net->unx.sysctl_max_dgram_qlen = 10;
> if (unix_sysctl_register(net))
> goto out;
>
> diff --git a/net/unix/sysctl_net_unix.c b/net/unix/sysctl_net_unix.c
> --- a/net/unix/sysctl_net_unix.c
> +++ b/net/unix/sysctl_net_unix.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ static ctl_table unix_table[] = {
> {
> .ctl_name = NET_UNIX_MAX_DGRAM_QLEN,
> .procname = "max_dgram_qlen",
> - .data = &init_net.sysctl_unix_max_dgram_qlen,
> + .data = &init_net.unx.sysctl_max_dgram_qlen,
> .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> .mode = 0644,
> .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec
> @@ -40,9 +40,9 @@ int unix_sysctl_register(struct net *net)
> if (table == NULL)
> goto err_alloc;
>
> - table[0].data = &net->sysctl_unix_max_dgram_qlen;
> - net->unix_ctl = register_net_sysctl_table(net, unix_path, table);
> - if (net->unix_ctl == NULL)
> + table[0].data = &net->unx.sysctl_max_dgram_qlen;
> + net->unx.ctl = register_net_sysctl_table(net, unix_path, table);
> + if (net->unx.ctl == NULL)
> goto err_reg;
>
> return 0;
> @@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ void unix_sysctl_unregister(struct net *net)
> {
> struct ctl_table *table;
>
> - table = net->unix_ctl->ctl_table_arg;
> - unregister_sysctl_table(net->unix_ctl);
> + table = net->unx.ctl->ctl_table_arg;
> + unregister_sysctl_table(net->unx.ctl);
> kfree(table);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-11 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-11 7:45 [PATCH 2.6.25] netns: struct net content re-work (v2) Denis V. Lunev
2007-12-11 9:57 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2007-12-11 10:27 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=475E5F12.10900@fr.ibm.com \
--to=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.