All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Pratt <slpratt@austin.ibm.com>
To: Zhao Forrest <forrest.zhao@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MPTSAS Driver and scatter gather lists
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:59:57 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <475EA5ED.3070603@austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac8af0be0712110018s647b0d04o5dc96dbe318a9759@mail.gmail.com>

Zhao Forrest wrote:
> Steve,
> Do you use a 10k RPM SAS hard drive? Could you share that what test
> tools(or test cases) are you using to do the block IO test? We have a
> LSI SAS1068E chip and 10k RPM SAS hard drive in our lab. I'll find
> some time to reproduce the issue and do some investigation.
>
>   
I've been using 10k and 15k drives (although these particular tests were 
from 15k).  I've been mostly using an internal IO tool, but this is 
easily reproducible with dd using the iflag=direct to force ODIRECT. 

Steve

> Thanks,
> Forrest
>
> On 12/4/07, Steven Pratt <slpratt@austin.ibm.com> wrote:
>   
>> I was doing some performance comparisons between the aic94xx sas adapter
>> and the mptsas (lsi1078 chip) and saw that performance was slightly
>> lower on lsi using the same drive. One thing I noticed the mptsas driver
>> was only setting sg_tablesize to 40 which restricts the maximum size of
>> the IO to 160kb.  This is inefficient and so I changed it to 255 (max
>> value) for testing purposes.  The results were not what I expected.
>> While CPU efficiency was improved at the larger block sizes (like I had
>> hopped), there were drastic improvements at small (<16k) block sizes
>> which is completely surprising).  So I decided to see where all the time
>> was being spent.  When doing oprofile, loss of idle ticks was confusing
>> things so I booted with idle=poll, and magically the original mptsas
>> driver now performs like the modified version at the small block sizes.
>> My suspicion is that we have some some sleep delay which is minimized by
>> going into poll mode, but I have no idea why changing the sg_tablesize
>> gives the same results regardless of poll mode.  I should reiterate that
>> I am not talking about small difference. This is 2x performance at 1/3 cpu.
>>
>> Also, is there any reason we can't increase sg_tablesize for mptsas?
>>
>> Any thoughts or experiments to try are welcome.
>> Steve
>> -
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>     


      parent reply	other threads:[~2007-12-11 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-04 15:45 MPTSAS Driver and scatter gather lists Steven Pratt
2007-12-04 19:58 ` Moore, Eric
2007-12-04 22:48   ` Steven Pratt
2007-12-11  8:18 ` Zhao Forrest
2007-12-11 14:49   ` Steven Pratt
2007-12-11 14:59   ` Steven Pratt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=475EA5ED.3070603@austin.ibm.com \
    --to=slpratt@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=forrest.zhao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.