From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [64.233.184.228] (helo=wr-out-0506.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J2NeZ-0003o6-Qk for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:13:19 +0100 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c30so92514wra.24 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:09:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.195.21 with SMTP id s21mr117050ybf.9.1197450541475; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:09:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.204? ( [24.107.180.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i5sm5024024nzi.2007.12.12.01.08.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:08:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <475FA50C.1090502@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 03:08:28 -0600 From: Junqian Gordon Xu User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071020) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1197404752.475ef250762ff@imp.free.fr> <475F8A75.9070902@gmail.com> <1197453642.475fb14ab7dc9@imp.free.fr> In-Reply-To: <1197453642.475fb14ab7dc9@imp.free.fr> Subject: Re: version of octave X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:13:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/12/2007 04:00 AM, Alain2210 wrote: > Now that 2.1.73 is the preferred version, how can I bitbake octave_2.9.19 ? bitbake octave-2.9.19 or bitbake -b octave_2.9.19.bb Could you let me know how you feel about RDEPENDS = fftw3. Octave could also provide it's own fft routine using lapack. It's a trade-off between less dependency and performance. I just don't know how many people are using fft with octave on embedded device. I will count the votes here. Regards Gordon