From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qk1-f195.google.com (mail-qk1-f195.google.com [209.85.222.195]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.20372.1594140451212090373 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 09:47:31 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=IwIAbnyD; spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.222.195, mailfrom: raj.khem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk1-f195.google.com with SMTP id b4so38709949qkn.11 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 09:47:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uR1oOx7K8yU3LvP/MTkWeI+7Wu3Eop7UtN+qQYaaVzk=; b=IwIAbnyD1w0UUJ/GVDgJAHSwfMaHgPaMhqkpq8vA05q2gjd1FRD7yX4CfmlOmI8/DE 8o+N/9LKH1rshxd6veIFWxcG2qUJY+eH+dIX2Id6pfEN74B0p40qOiKsyh56rAXnqejG Rt/Wz7gYrkZbwcEkPo2R8P3jLl/HXGjhXF4QCHSGbOI3dtKC8kMSt4Ddhusf+Ulqjfs2 0XKY4ev5GjzPipcUzNxl9PFeSLFioW9SNmXdSNQ5/fJvJDXvW1GGy8ggpOSJsAR6WtLO kx3J7T9HCwpV7c5C9jAPgZSkjibXv3UJ7aA2ukoNEAUvasDKr9jBpfyrSE2moIOh3pyc tAIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uR1oOx7K8yU3LvP/MTkWeI+7Wu3Eop7UtN+qQYaaVzk=; b=jexwZTunKZyK58MjjbHneeV8ALytQk/x/WrkxiIcOBEef6g70WRGJA4/DNgVR/HuIN 2DoyWVnxyJnx7y7M4xWkQZMFaiZU7GTir0wZXlP9vfHNkqgWG5ZoekzMS3aARtX1EF3W PiOLaxylwEm+8AL/yIi8NSdNy6ISdCcYAs8Lmwv2Za7/WtHspTDfiwZpO6dsNPXIVZXV ekJ4feM/l9TjgDA3/MmdwPfcffV6bTFVhqXsZl3BkPokdtMyKzKr0mQTTfqUblrGx8O+ lhK0+vJn7ZGdVc/EQJlg4XMEnmsJT6AvLvKweAHmx4NaCV27O6AtfNi5173T7FhvXmUm wVlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532AGW+1uVW9ApL8v7FVOJ7XX5EP2+XTscM9Y/rfkSDqgXrFEkP1 p59DHcOfkEgOBWrJnmk4xutF5n6jUDY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw7M5/7N7K1eZllC2qEKtrJkTptxNsMvOPsCe71EDXIlErr0hwwx+/9TagXC+yVHebpVdiAEg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:79a:: with SMTP id 26mr46886086qka.169.1594140449901; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 09:47:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:9200:4e0:61e6:5be1:19c9:154e? ([2601:646:9200:4e0:61e6:5be1:19c9:154e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k18sm22932867qki.30.2020.07.07.09.47.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Jul 2020 09:47:29 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [meta-arm][PATCH] meta-arm: Use dynamic layer magic to build trusted-firmware-m To: Ross Burton Cc: meta-arm@lists.yoctoproject.org References: <20200703145233.2494070-1-raj.khem@gmail.com> From: "Khem Raj" Message-ID: <475ba942-5c19-c36e-9882-b193f0f4ee20@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 09:47:28 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/6/20 2:23 PM, Ross Burton wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 15:52, Khem Raj wrote: >> +BBFILES_DYNAMIC += " \ >> + arm-toolchain:${LAYERDIR}/dynamic-layers/arm-toolchain/*/*/*.bb \ >> + arm-toolchain:${LAYERDIR}/dynamic-layers/arm-toolchain/*/*/*.bbappend \ > > What I dislike about dynamic layers is how nested everything gets. > How about something more like: > > BBFILES_DYNAMIC += > "arm-toolchain:${LAYERDIR}/with-arm-toolchain/recipes-*/*/*.bb" > > One less directory level, and all of the dynamic layers are at the > top-level alongside the recipes. > > I'm also still unsure why there's so much pushback towards adding > arm-toolchain. reason meta-arm is needed for me is becuase meta-ti asks for it and now there is another dependency added so I am a bit not-nice to this because this serves no use for me as tf-a and tf-m are not even needed for machines of interest, but it does show up on world builds and broke last time. It doesn't do anything by simply adding the layer, if > you don't build tf-m it won't get used at all, and I want to get rid > of it anyway (using multiconfig to build a gcc). Can you explain why > this dependency is so important to you? I'm obviously not > understanding something, and I'm on the record for hating on binary > toolchains over many years! > > Ross >