From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [209.85.132.241] (helo=an-out-0708.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J2gcs-00043w-6w for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:28:50 +0100 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b33so131011ana.83 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:24:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.208.11 with SMTP id f11mr3321116ang.2.1197523465589; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:24:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.204? ( [24.107.180.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i5sm6068010nzi.2007.12.12.21.24.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:24:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4760C1BA.7060206@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:23:06 -0600 From: Junqian Gordon Xu User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071020) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: ANN: Sonkei X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 05:28:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/12/2007 11:08 AM, Sonkei release team wrote: > * usability - we respect that everybody is short on time I feel your pain. There indeed is a need for people working on usability. I applaud the effort. However, I don't get it how Sonkei differs from Angstrom, except for differences in perhaps prefered-versions and individual bb files. Is Sonkei something like Angstrom-stable? Regards Gordon