From: Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@ge.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Can U-boot Autodetect arch/ppcversusarch/powerpc from info in the uImage?
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:49:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47617EB3.5030809@ge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071209150038.D560B247F5@gemini.denx.de>
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <1197205927.937.51.camel@gentoo-jocke.transmode.se> you wrote:
>> Made a new patch with Jerrys comments addressed. Also renamed
>> DEFAULT_OF_TREE to CFG_OF_TREE. OK?
>
> I still object against this modification.
>
>> +#ifdef CFG_OF_TREE
>> + char *of_flat_tree = CFG_OF_TREE;
>> +#else
>> char *of_flat_tree = NULL;
>> +#endif
>> ulong of_data = 0;
>> #endif
>
> I hereby NAK this patch for 3 reasons:
>
> 1) The patch does not solve a problem. Instead of hardwiring the
> address, you can just pass it as argument to the bootm command
> which seems more straightforward to me
>
> 2) The patch causes confusion. Documented behaviour is that "bootm"
> with one or two arguments (kernel address, or kernel plus ramdisk
> addresses) will boot a non-OF enabled kernel. With this patch,
> "bootm" will behave different on systems where the CFG_OF_TREE has
> been selected - which is usually not known to and cannot be
> checked by the end user, thus causing confusion.
>
> 3) With the patch applied and CFG_OF_TREE defined, there is no way to
> boot a non-OF kernel, thus breaking backward compatibility.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
FWIIW, #2 and #3 are serious problems that I had not considered when I
supported Jocke's proposed patch. Sorry, Jocke, but I have to side with
Wolfgang in light of those arguments.
Best regards,
gvb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-13 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-03 18:49 [U-Boot-Users] Can U-boot Autodetect arch/ppc versus arch/powerpc from info in the uImage? Darcy Watkins
2007-12-03 21:36 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-12-03 23:33 ` [U-Boot-Users] Can U-boot Autodetect arch/ppc versusarch/powerpc " Joakim Tjernlund
2007-12-04 0:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-12-04 1:06 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2007-12-06 22:43 ` [U-Boot-Users] Can U-boot Autodetect arch/ppcversusarch/powerpc " Joakim Tjernlund
2007-12-07 0:57 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-12-07 6:55 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2007-12-07 11:11 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-12-07 13:14 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-12-09 13:12 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2007-12-09 15:00 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-12-09 17:32 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2007-12-09 19:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-12-09 21:14 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2007-12-09 21:36 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-12-09 21:59 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2007-12-09 22:47 ` [U-Boot-Users] Can U-boot Autodetect arch/ppcversusarch/powerpcfrom " Joakim Tjernlund
2007-12-13 18:49 ` Jerry Van Baren [this message]
2007-12-13 23:03 ` [U-Boot-Users] Can U-boot Autodetect arch/ppcversusarch/powerpc from " Joakim Tjernlund
2007-12-14 15:53 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2007-12-16 20:14 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-12-16 21:27 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2007-12-17 14:42 ` Joakim Tjernlund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47617EB3.5030809@ge.com \
--to=gerald.vanbaren@ge.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.