From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 19:30:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 19:30:19 -0500 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.132]:59101 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 19:27:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 16:29:03 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Andrew Morton cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Warning: dev (pts(136,0)) tty->count(5) != #fd's(4) in tty_open Message-ID: <47650000.1047428943@flay> In-Reply-To: <20030311162153.493a305e.akpm@digeo.com> References: <45750000.1047426594@flay> <20030311162153.493a305e.akpm@digeo.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> I'm getting lots of these messages whilst running big SDET runs on >> an 16-way machine ... anyone recognize them? >> (64-bk3 + a few patches). >> >> dev (pts(136,0)) tty->count(4) != #fd's(3) in release_dev > > The file_list_lock patches affect this. Do you have those applied? Yes, sorry ... was running out the door, crap description ;-) > If so, and if it is repeatable, this might help. (Unlikely, but it might). Mmm ... OK. will try that. Thanks, M.