From: John Reiser <jreiser@BitWagon.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: slab quirks in DEBUG, ctor, and initialization
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:47:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47669A16.3010604@BitWagon.com> (raw)
In mm/slab.c, the DEBUG variant of cache_alloc_debugcheck_after
might call cachep->ctor(objp, cachep, 0); but the non-DEBUG
variant does absolutely nothing. idr_pre_get is a routine
which notices the difference.
Even when cache_alloc_debugcheck_after does invoke the ctor,
then it is conditional upon cachep->flags & SLAB_POISON . This
assumes that the only two states are poisoned and all-zero
(from .bss static, or via a cleared new page frame.)
So if SLAB_POISON is not specified, then a ctor which
does anything other than memset(,0,) is out of luck.
Instead: if a ctor is specified then it should be called
for each successful allocation.
Invoking the ctor from within cache_alloc_debugcheck_after makes it
awkward for a dynamic checker of allocations and initializations.
Valgrind would be happier if allocation and initialization were
invoked at the same subroutine nesting level, such as in __cache_alloc:
cache_alloc_debugcheck_before(cachep, flags);
local_irq_save(save_flags);
objp = __do_cache_alloc(cachep, flags);
/* checker marks the space as allocated */
local_irq_restore(save_flags);
objp = cache_alloc_debugcheck_after(cachep, flags, objp, caller);
if (objp && cachep->ctor)
cachep->ctor(objp, cachep, 0);
/* checker notes initializations during ctor [above] */
--
John Reiser, jreiser@BitWagon.com
next reply other threads:[~2007-12-17 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-17 15:47 John Reiser [this message]
2007-12-17 19:51 ` slab quirks in DEBUG, ctor, and initialization Pekka Enberg
2007-12-17 21:19 ` John Reiser
2007-12-17 21:55 ` Pekka J Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47669A16.3010604@BitWagon.com \
--to=jreiser@bitwagon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.