From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [NETFILTER 00/64]: Netfilter update Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:31:53 +0100 Message-ID: <4767A199.3040308@trash.net> References: <20071217234612.23601.6979.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20071217.225126.26533748.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:51420 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753778AbXLRKcE (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:32:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20071217.225126.26533748.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller wrote: > I applied everthing to net-2.6.25 and pushed it all out, including > the NETFILTER_ADVANCED thing. It was definitely an improvement. Thanks Dave. > Can you do something for me Patrick? Go from a config with > NETFILTER disabled, then turn it on, use NETFILTER_ADVANCED=n > and walk through the options presented to the user. > > Some of those default=m cases are marked EXPERIMENTAL. Either the > default=m or the EXPERIMENTAL are bogus, in each case. Most of the > time it's the latter, and if you could fix these I'd appreciate it. Sure, I'll include a patch in my next update. Its a good opportunity to go through all netfilter EXPERIMENTAL marks, I bet there are more that could be removed.