From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [NETFILTER 00/64]: Netfilter update Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:32:24 +0100 Message-ID: <4767AFC8.2050906@netfilter.org> References: <20071217234612.23601.6979.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20071217.225126.26533748.davem@davemloft.net> <4767A199.3040308@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:50541 "EHLO us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753871AbXLRLbB (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:31:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4767A199.3040308@trash.net> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Patrick McHardy wrote: > David Miller wrote: >> Some of those default=m cases are marked EXPERIMENTAL. Either the >> default=m or the EXPERIMENTAL are bogus, in each case. Most of the >> time it's the latter, and if you could fix these I'd appreciate it. > > Sure, I'll include a patch in my next update. Its a good opportunity > to go through all netfilter EXPERIMENTAL marks, I bet there are > more that could be removed. maybe ctnetlink? :-)