From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756843AbXLSTg6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:36:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753440AbXLSTgu (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:36:50 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:39401 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753340AbXLSTgt (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:36:49 -0500 Message-ID: <476972A0.3050105@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:36:00 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Venki Pallipadi , Thomas Gleixner , Len Brown , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Voluntary leave_mm before entering ACPI C3 References: <20071219183443.GA547@linux-os.sc.intel.com> <20071219193255.GA2158@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20071219193255.GA2158@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Venki Pallipadi wrote: > >> Aviod TLB flush IPIs during C3 states by voluntary leave_mm() before >> entering C3. >> >> The performance impact of TLB flush on C3 should not be significant >> with respect to C3 wakeup latency. Also, CPUs tend to flush TLB in >> hardware while in C3 anyways. >> Are there any CPUs around which *don't* flush the TLB across C3? (I guess it's not guaranteed by the spec, though, and as TLBs grow larger there might be incentive to keep them online.) -hpa