From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: tcamuso@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, prarit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:12:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4769B368.1030402@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa.3T2SqNjavN55hanLOjr3RO+WalE@ifi.uio.no>
Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 05:17:46PM -0500, tcamuso@redhat.com wrote:
>> OVERVIEW
>> =======
>>
>> The patches should be applied in sequence to obviate any
>> possible build problems.
>>
>> The patch-set was built against 2.6.24-rc5
>>
>> Description
>> ===========
>>
>> There exist devices that do not respond correctly to PCI
>> MMCONFIG accesses in x86 platforms.
>
> What devices are these? Do you have reports of them somewhere?
>
>> This patch-set detects the problem by comparing an MMCONFIG
>> read to a Legacy PCI config read of the vendor/device dword
>> of every device discovered during the PCI probing sequence.
>>
>> A miscompare means that a device does not correctly respond
>> to MMCONFIG accesses. When the patch code detects this condition,
>> the bus that serves this device, and all subordinate buses, will
>> be programmed to use Legacy PCI Config accesses.
>>
>> This patch-set DOES NOT detect devices that generate machine
>> checks against MMCONFIG accesses. For such systems,
>> "pci=nommconf" is required in the boot command.
>
> That sounds like this patchset can cause bad side affects on hardware
> that currently works just fine. That is not a good thing to be adding
> to the kernel, right?
I think we need more details on why this patch is needed. Also, we
already have something like this in arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c, in
the unreachable_devices function. This attempts to detect devices where
MMCONFIG cannot access the configuration space (one of these would be at
least one device in the AMD K8 built-in northbridge). If this is not
sufficient, I would suggest expanding that mechanism instead of adding
all this new code.
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
next parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-20 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.zIbPFbLub6ANMT5vMxS6hx+dfv0@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.3T2SqNjavN55hanLOjr3RO+WalE@ifi.uio.no>
2007-12-20 0:12 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2007-12-20 12:28 [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG] Tony Camuso
2007-12-20 17:22 ` Greg KH
2007-12-20 18:25 ` Tony Camuso
2007-12-20 21:57 ` Greg KH
2007-12-20 22:36 ` Tony Camuso
2007-12-20 22:40 ` Greg KH
2008-01-08 3:20 ` [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG Tony Camuso
2008-01-08 4:56 ` Greg KH
2008-01-08 13:14 ` Tony Camuso
2008-01-08 13:36 ` Greg KH
2008-01-08 13:44 ` Tony Camuso
[not found] <20071219221746.20362.39243.sendpatchset@dhcp83-188.boston.redhat.com>
2007-12-19 23:16 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4769B368.1030402@shaw.ca \
--to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=tcamuso@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.