From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [66.111.4.28] (helo=out4.smtp.messagingengine.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J5TGm-0007Rf-Iq for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:49:32 +0100 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBB580C3B for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:44:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:44:24 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: TL9P9UHSgtq7egR5due2IcFzlC2FV4N62P7q9k2FI0l1 1198187063 Received: from [192.168.18.11] (CPE-121-209-21-249.sa.bigpond.net.au [121.209.21.249]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4845DBF88 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:44:22 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <476AE1F0.400@whitby.id.au> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:13:12 +1030 From: Rod Whitby User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <200712201540.11149.openembedded@haerwu.biz> <571189143.20071220182116@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <571189143.20071220182116@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [oe-commits] org.oe.dev distro/openwrt-sdk.conf: Distro config to build packages for OpenWRT. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:49:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > Hello Marcin, > Thursday, December 20, 2007, 4:40:09 PM, you wrote: >> MACHINE=wrt54 + DISTRO=wrt54oe builds toolchain which builds packages >> usable under OpenWRT. At least it worked like that when I tested it over >> year ago. > > Year, a year ago, that's the key. I'll have an RFC to deprecate wrt54oe, > asusoe and some other stuff possibly lurking there in favor of openwrt-sdk.conf, > once I'll prepare argument list for it (and the first one will be that its > name corresponds to what it does). I think I contributed at least one of those distro.conf's and it's a +1 from me on replacing them with a generic openwrt-sdk.conf -- Rod