From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC drivers for the Freescale MPC8610 SoC Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:37:39 -0600 Message-ID: <476AEEB3.2010403@freescale.com> References: <11981089894052-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <20071220040633.GA6732@lixom.net> <476A7B23.2040905@freescale.com> <20071220223943.GA24138@lixom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D842485F for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:37:48 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20071220223943.GA24138@lixom.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Olof Johansson Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Olof Johansson wrote: >> I was just following the example from another board file. However, the 'soc' >> node in the device tree does not have a compatible property, so I don't how to >> change this. > > Then add an appropriate compatible entry to it, please. None of the SOC nodes in any DTS have a "compatible" entry. I understand the issue, but you're asking me to fix a larger problem, one that is beyond the scope of this patch. You're saying that *all* SOC needs are incorrectly defined and need to be probed differently. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale