From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC drivers for the Freescale MPC8610 SoC Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:44:49 -0600 Message-ID: <476AF061.1030605@freescale.com> References: <11981089894052-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <9e4733910712201429q5845e786yb2ecb3ce9c8b7871@mail.gmail.com> <476AED87.3090703@freescale.com> <9e4733910712201438u2165aa77t8eab91bccb4c5bda@mail.gmail.com> <476AEF47.8040802@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <476AEF47.8040802@freescale.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org To: Timur Tabi Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Timur Tabi wrote: > Jon Smirl wrote: > >> mpc5200 does it like this: >> of_platform_bus_probe(NULL, NULL, NULL); > > I think that tells the OF base code to probe everything in the device tree, > which is probably overkill. I think fsl_soc.c covers most of the device tree, > but the SSI is not defined in fsl_soc.c. Not quite; it tells it to use a built-in list of bus matches. Most of which are device_type-based, FWIW. -Scott