-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Doing this I believe I found a bug in bug in SELinux,  that I am not
sure how we fix.

Steps to produce bug.

Build and install

http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/example-1.0-0.fc9.src.rpm

This will install a daemon program

/usr/sbin/example
/var/spool/example
/etc/init.d/example

All of these should be labeled correctly

Now start the daemon
# rpm -Uhv example-1.0-0.fc9.noarch.rpm
# service example start

This will only create a pid file /var/run/example.pid

Now make sure everything is labeled correctly

# ls -ldZ /usr/sbin/example /etc/init.d/example /var/spool/example/
/var/run/example.pid
- -rwxr-xr-x  root root system_u:object_r:example_script_exec_t
/etc/init.d/example
- -rwxr-xr-x  root root system_u:object_r:example_exec_t /usr/sbin/example
- -rw-r--r--  root root system_u:object_r:example_var_run_t
/var/run/example.pid
drwxr-xr-x  root root system_u:object_r:example_spool_t /var/spool/example/

Touch a file in /var/spool/example to make sure rpm does not remove with
the package

# touch /var/spool/example/example.tmp

Now I am going to test the uninstall of the package.


rpm -e example

ls -ldZ /usr/sbin/example /etc/init.d/example /var/spool/example/
/var/run/example.pid
ls: cannot access /usr/sbin/example: No such file or directory
ls: cannot access /etc/init.d/example: No such file or directory
- -rw-r--r--  root root system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t
/var/run/example.pid
drwxr-xr-x  root root system_u:object_r:var_spool_t    /var/spool/example/

# restorecon -R -v /var/run/example.pid
# ls -lZ /var/run/example.pid
- -rw-r--r--  root root system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t
/var/run/example.pid

It leaves the pid file as unlabeled_t, this is because

/var/run/.*\.*pid	<<none>>

Which tells restorecon to not change any context on a pid file.  But
leaving the file as unlabeled_t causes other problems.

Now I reinstall the package

# rpm -Uhv
/home/devel/dwalsh/sources/RPMS/noarch/example-1.0-0.fc9.noarch.rpm
Preparing...                ###########################################
[100%]
   1:example                ###########################################
[100%]
/sbin/restorecon set context
/var/run/example.pid->system_u:object_r:example_var_run_t:s0
failed:'Permission denied'

AVC is generated

time->Thu Dec 20 19:28:50 2007
type=PATH msg=audit(1198196930.130:1540): item=0
name="/var/run/example.pid" inode=3178877 dev=fd:00 mode=0100644 ouid=0
ogid=0 rdev=00:00 obj=system_u:object_r:example_var_run_t:s0
type=CWD msg=audit(1198196930.130:1540):  cwd="/"
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1198196930.130:1540): arch=40000003 syscall=227
success=no exit=-13 a0=bfcbd7e0 a1=1417c1 a2=ba1ed1e0 a3=27 items=1
ppid=23898 pid=23928 auid=3267 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0
sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=pts2 comm="restorecon" exe="/sbin/setfiles"
subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:setfiles_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null)
type=AVC msg=audit(1198196930.130:1540): avc:  denied  { relabelto } for
 pid=23928 comm="restorecon" name="example.pid" dev=dm-0 ino=3178877
scontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:setfiles_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
tcontext=system_u:object_r:example_var_run_t:s0 tclass=file

If I pipe this to audit2why
type=AVC msg=audit(1198196930.130:1540): avc:  denied  { relabelto } for
 pid=23928 comm="restorecon" name="example.pid" dev=dm-0 ino=3178877
scontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:setfiles_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
tcontext=system_u:object_r:example_var_run_t:s0 tclass=file
	Was caused by:
		Unknown - would be allowed by active policy
		Possible mismatch between this policy and the one under which the
audit message was generated.
		Possible mismatch between current in-memory boolean settings vs.
permanent ones.


If I run restorecon on it now, it is fine.

If I do the exact same steps above, but change the context on
/var/run/example.pid to say bin_t.

The install happens successfully.

It seems that during the rpm update the policy in the kernel is
different then when it completes.  All the postinstall is doing is

# semodule -s targeted -i example.pp
followed by a fixfiles on the files in example.spec

Why this would work outside the rpm transaction but not inside is the
bug.  Why does it work with the label of bin_t, but not when it is
labeled unlabeled_t?







-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHa9MhrlYvE4MpobMRAi2JAKCG3CwfOhRYvda7VrL3ehNx6DC5mQCfRtuD
QFGHQmAek1Pt91e4vorEY9w=
=igaV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----