All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: Janek Kozicki <janek_listy@wp.pl>
Cc: Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: raid10: unfair disk load?
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 23:56:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <476C2869.1080903@msgid.tls.msk.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071221174902.6fc02c4e@absurd>

Janek Kozicki wrote:
> Michael Tokarev said: (by the date of Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:53:38 +0300)
> 
>>> I just noticed that with Linux software RAID10, disk
>>> usage isn't equal at all, that is, most reads are
>>> done from the first part of mirror(s) only.
> 
> what's your kernel version? I recall that recently there have been
> some works regarding load balancing.

It was in my original email:

> The kernel is 2.6.23 but very similar behavior is
> shown by earlier kernels as well.  Raid10 stripe
> size is 256Mb, but again it doesn't really matter
> other sizes behave the same here.

Strange I missed the new raid10 development you
mentioned (I follow linux-raid quite closely).
Lemme see...  no, nothing relevant in 2.6.24-rc5
(compared with 2.6.23), at least git doesn't show
anything interesting.  What change(s) you're
referring to?

Thanks.

/mjt

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-21 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <476BA4FD.6080401@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
2007-12-21 11:53 ` raid10: unfair disk load? Michael Tokarev
2007-12-21 16:49   ` Janek Kozicki
2007-12-21 20:56     ` Michael Tokarev [this message]
2007-12-22 12:05       ` Janek Kozicki
2007-12-22 13:04         ` Jon Nelson
     [not found]           ` <beb6123c0712222034g68743afv31c644ff4dd9aaff@mail.gmail.com>
2007-12-23 12:36             ` Michael Tokarev
     [not found]               ` <beb6123c0712230521r2a8a43aboe097fc2fc943c3ae@mail.gmail.com>
2007-12-23 14:23                 ` Jon Nelson
2007-12-23 19:22                   ` Richard Scobie
2007-12-25 20:18                     ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=476C2869.1080903@msgid.tls.msk.ru \
    --to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=janek_listy@wp.pl \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.