From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC drivers for the Freescale MPC8610 SoC Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 20:58:21 -0600 Message-ID: <476DCECD.6040008@freescale.com> References: <11981089894052-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <20071220040633.GA6732@lixom.net> <476A7B23.2040905@freescale.com> <20071220223943.GA24138@lixom.net> <476AEEB3.2010403@freescale.com> <476AF015.5040600@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0717D24489 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2007 03:58:32 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <476AF015.5040600@freescale.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Scott Wood Cc: Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Scott Wood wrote: >> None of the SOC nodes in any DTS have a "compatible" entry. > > Not quite true; ep88xc, mpc8272ads, and pq2fads have them. Ah ok. So what should the compatible entry for 8641 be? compatible = "fsl,mpc8641" That looks a lot like what a compatible entry for the CPU should be. How are we differentiating between the compatible cores and compatible SOCs?