All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: delay via-rhine irq initialisation.
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:36:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <476DD7CC.9090507@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071211233909.GA22470@redhat.com>

Dave Jones wrote:
> With CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ set, via-rhine complains during init.
> (See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=377721 for a report).
> 
> Does this diff look right?
> (I don't have a via-rhine handy to test with)
> 
> We may be able to get away with moving the request_irq to just after the
> alloc_tbufs(), but I feel if a real interrupt occured, this diff would
> stand more chance of doing the right thing.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> 	Dave
> 
> Delay irq registration until after we've allocated ring buffers,
> otherwise DEBUG_SHIRQ will complain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/via-rhine.c b/drivers/net/via-rhine.c
> index 07263cd..37b3efb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/via-rhine.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/via-rhine.c
> @@ -1151,24 +1151,28 @@ static int rhine_open(struct net_device *dev)
>  	void __iomem *ioaddr = rp->base;
>  	int rc;
>  
> -	rc = request_irq(rp->pdev->irq, &rhine_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED, dev->name,
> -			dev);
> -	if (rc)
> -		return rc;
> -
>  	if (debug > 1)
>  		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: rhine_open() irq %d.\n",
>  		       dev->name, rp->pdev->irq);
>  
>  	rc = alloc_ring(dev);
> -	if (rc) {
> -		free_irq(rp->pdev->irq, dev);
> +	if (rc)
>  		return rc;
> -	}
> +
>  	alloc_rbufs(dev);
>  	alloc_tbufs(dev);
>  	rhine_chip_reset(dev);
>  	init_registers(dev);
> +
> +	rc = request_irq(rp->pdev->irq, &rhine_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED, dev->name,
> +			dev);
> +	if (rc) {
> +		free_rbufs(dev);
> +		free_tbufs(dev);
> +		free_ring(dev);
> +		return rc;
> +	}
> +

Absolutely we want to do this.  DEBUG_SHIRQ is only one of many reasons 
-- quite simply, you are fixing an order-of-init bug that leads to races 
and other badness.

I would request that the error cleanup be done in the standard style for 
net drivers (indeed, most drivers):

	rc = request_irq(...);
	if (rc)
		goto err_out;

	...

	return 0;

     err_out:
	...
	return rc;

Also I would change the subject to something like "fix order of init 
bugs" or "fix races" or whatnot.

We must assume, when writing drivers, that an interrupt will be 
delivered _immediately_ once request_irq() is called -- possibly even 
before request_irq() has returned its return code.

Regards,

	Jeff



  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-23  3:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-11 23:39 delay via-rhine irq initialisation Dave Jones
2007-12-23  3:36 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2008-01-02 23:34   ` Chuck Ebbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=476DD7CC.9090507@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.