From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4772D19C.4030506@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 23:11:40 +0100 From: Philippe Gerum MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <477275E0.7080001@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <477275E0.7080001@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Philippe Gerum Subject: Re: [Adeos-main] [PATCH 3/3] i386: Cleanup root IRQ trampolines Reply-To: rpm@xenomai.org List-Id: General discussion about Adeos List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: adeos-main Jan Kiszka wrote: > Simplifies xirq trampoline and applies the xirq refactorings to > virq_handler too. > --- linux-2.6.23.12-xeno.orig/include/asm-i386/ipipe.h +++ linux-2.6.23.12-xeno/include/asm-i386/ipipe.h @@ -141,11 +141,7 @@ __ipipe_call_root_xirq_handler(unsigned "pushl %%ds\n\t" "pushl %%eax\n\t" "pushl %%ebp\n\t" - "pushl %%edi\n\t" - "pushl %%esi\n\t" - "pushl %%edx\n\t" - "pushl %%ecx\n\t" - "pushl %%ebx\n\t" + "subl $5*4,%%esp # rest can remain unsaved\n\t" This won't work. We actually want to save our regs, so that they are restored when going back to xirq_end through the iret path. If we don't save them, the registers will remain terminally clobbered. "movl %[regs],%%eax # always pass tick regs\n\t" "call *%[handler]\n\t" @@ -158,33 +154,41 @@ __ipipe_call_root_xirq_handler(unsigned : "eax"); } [snip] +static inline void +__ipipe_call_root_virq_handler(unsigned irq, + void (*handler)(unsigned irq, void *cookie), + void *cookie) +{ + irq_enter(); + __asm__ __volatile__ ( + "pushfl\n\t" + "pushl %%cs\n\t" + "pushl $virq_end\n\t" + "pushl %%eax # dummy value\n\t" We do want -1 to be pushed here, not any dummy value, so that the signal handling code is not going to try restarting some interrupted syscall when running the Linux epilogue for us. This is consistent with having negated irq numbers pushed onto interrupt frames (see handle_signal and friends). + "pushl %%fs\n\t" + "pushl %%es\n\t" + "pushl %%ds\n\t" + "pushl %%eax\n\t" + "pushl %%ebp\n\t" + "subl $5*4,%%esp # rest can remain unsaved\n\t" + Same problem as above. + "pushl %[cookie]\n\t" + "pushl %[irq]\n\t" + "call *%[handler]\n\t" We need to conform both to regparm(0) and regparm(3) when passing args to the interrupt handler (i.e we don't know the convention used, especially by assembly code grabbing an IRQ), and regparm(3) is missing now. C-written ones are likely to follow regparm(3) as the rest of the kernel unless they explicitly fiddle with compiler pragmas. We could get rid of regparm(0) in x86 code, requiring all handlers to conform to regparm(3), but not the other way around. + "addl $8,%%esp\n\t" \ + : /* no output */ \ + : [irq] "rm" (irq), [handler] "rm" (handler), + [cookie] "rm" (cookie)); + irq_exit(); + __asm__ __volatile__ ( + "jmp ret_from_intr # Linux IRQ epilogue\n\t" + "virq_end: cli\n\t" + : /* no output */ + : /* no input */); +} This said, the fix regarding CPU accounting is right, and passing the tick regs from the trampoline looks definitely saner than tweaking timer_interrupt() for the same purpose, so I'll merge that part. -- Philippe.