From: Hideo AOKI <haoki@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, vladislav.yasevich@hp.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net,
tyasui@redhat.com, mhiramat@redhat.com,
satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com, billfink@mindspring.com,
andi@firstfloor.org, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru,
shemminger@linux-foundation.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com, haoki@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] New interface for memory accounting (take 1)
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:46:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47793923.7050003@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071230.233413.117211235.davem@davemloft.net>
Hello David,
David Miller wrote:
> From: Hideo AOKI <haoki@redhat.com>
> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:47:33 -0500
>
>> The patch set consists of the following 4 patches.
>>
>> [1/4] introducing new memory accounting interface
>> [2/4] adding memory accounting points to consolidate functions
>> [3/4] updating TCP to use new interface
>> [4/4] updating SCTP to use new interface
>
> I like this work very much and will add this to net-2.6.25
> But I will have to combine it all into one patch.
>
> You cannot have one patch which breaks the build in any way. All of
> the kernel must build properly after each patch in your patchset is
> applied.
>
> Since patch 1 renames all of the sk_stream_*() functions, TCP and SCTP
> stop building.
That's correct.
> We enforce this rule, otherwise when users try to use "git bisect" to
> find out where regressions are added, they will get stuck in places
> like this where the tree will not build due to such careless
> changesets.
Thank you for your explanation. To be honest, I didn't know the rule
exactly. I am so sorry for sending inconvenient patch set.
Best regards,
Hideo
--
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-31 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-30 8:47 [PATCH 0/4] New interface for memory accounting (take 1) Hideo AOKI
2007-12-30 8:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] [CORE]: introducing new memory accounting interface Hideo AOKI
2007-12-30 8:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] [CORE]: adding memory accounting points Hideo AOKI
2007-12-31 7:58 ` David Miller
2007-12-31 18:52 ` Hideo AOKI
2007-12-30 8:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] [TCP]: using new interface Hideo AOKI
2007-12-30 8:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] [SCTP]: " Hideo AOKI
2007-12-31 7:34 ` [PATCH 0/4] New interface for memory accounting (take 1) David Miller
2007-12-31 15:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-12-31 19:03 ` Hideo AOKI
2007-12-31 23:01 ` David Miller
2007-12-31 18:46 ` Hideo AOKI [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47793923.7050003@redhat.com \
--to=haoki@redhat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=billfink@mindspring.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tyasui@redhat.com \
--cc=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
--cc=yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.