From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759331AbYABBWq (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jan 2008 20:22:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755571AbYABBWj (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jan 2008 20:22:39 -0500 Received: from home.nigel.suspend2.net ([203.171.70.205]:43222 "EHLO server1.example.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755530AbYABBWj (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jan 2008 20:22:39 -0500 Message-ID: <477AE75A.5080305@nigel.suspend2.net> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:22:34 +1100 From: Nigel Cunningham Reply-To: nigel@nigel.suspend2.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Theodore Tso , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , pm list , "The place to get help!" , suspend2-devel@lists.tuxonice.net, LKML Subject: Re: [Suspend2-devel] Freezing filesystems (Was Re: What's in store for 2008 for TuxOnIce?) References: <477AC060.5040004@nigel.suspend2.net> <200801020021.37259.rjw@sisk.pl> <477AD2AA.4070707@nigel.suspend2.net> <20080102010325.GC13288@mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20080102010325.GC13288@mit.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Ted. Theodore Tso wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:54:18AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: >>> I would also like the TuxOnIce issues related to drivers, ACPI, etc. to go to >>> one of the kernel-related lists, but I think linux-pm may be better for that >>> due to the much lower traffic. >> I guess that makes sense. I guess people can always be referred to LKML >> for the issues where the appropriate person isn't on linux-pm. > > Hi Nigel, > > I'd really recommend pushing the TuxOnIce discussions to LKML. That > way people can see the size of the user community and Andrew and Linus > can see how many people are using TuxOnIce. They can also see how > well the TuxOnIce community helps address user problems, which is a > big consideration when Linus decides whether or not to merge a > particular technology. > > If the goal is eventual merger of TuxOnIce, LKML is really the best > place to have the discussions. Examples such as Realtime, CFS, and > others have shown that you really want to keep the discussion front > and center. When one developer says, "not my problem; my code is > perfect", and the other developer is working with users who report > problems, guess which technology generally ends up getting merged by > Linus? Yes. The goal is eventual merger. That's what I was thinking too. Thanks for the input! Nigel