Re: virtio module backport

[Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've posted a repo that contains my initial attempt at backporting the 
> virtio modules.  I've tested against a 2.6.22, 2.6.20, and 2.6.18 kernel 
> (although I haven't tried the block device against 2.6.18).  It requires 
> Rusty's patch queue plus the three patches I just sent to 
> virtualization@l-f.
>
> The makefile supports a 'make sync LINUX=/path/to/linux' just like the 
> kvm-userspace/kernel directory does.
>
> This is still rough as I haven't went through and made sure all of the 
> #if's are right.
>
> http://hg.codemonkey.ws/virtio-ext-modules
>
>   

I think that 'typedef _Bool bool' is better than unsigned int, as it 
forces conversions to 0/1.

Modern Linux uses _Bool as well.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/