Re: virtio module backport

[Anthony Liguori <aliguori-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've posted a repo that contains my initial attempt at backporting 
>> the virtio modules.  I've tested against a 2.6.22, 2.6.20, and 2.6.18 
>> kernel (although I haven't tried the block device against 2.6.18).  
>> It requires Rusty's patch queue plus the three patches I just sent to 
>> virtualization@l-f.
>>
>> The makefile supports a 'make sync LINUX=/path/to/linux' just like 
>> the kvm-userspace/kernel directory does.
>>
>> This is still rough as I haven't went through and made sure all of 
>> the #if's are right.
>>
>> http://hg.codemonkey.ws/virtio-ext-modules
>>
>>   
>
> I think that 'typedef _Bool bool' is better than unsigned int, as it 
> forces conversions to 0/1.
>
> Modern Linux uses _Bool as well.
>

Fair enough.  I've updated.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/