From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/27] xt_helper match, revision 1 Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:03:58 +0100 Message-ID: <477E4ADE.5030308@trash.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:48951 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752015AbYADPHA (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2008 10:07:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > commit c3c5674fee490f6735136b2c9a7e39a30f25635e > Author: Jan Engelhardt > Date: Wed Jan 2 18:01:06 2008 +0100 > > [NETFILTER]: xt_helper match, revision 1 > > Introduces the xt_helper match revision 1. It uses fixed types, and > its structure size has been adjusted. > > The xt_helper revision 0 structure had an odd size of 34 bytes. I > changed this into 32 bytes, which probably plays much better with > cachelines. The invert flag is also shrunk so now there is an > additional byte available for the name as a side effect. Is there any real advantage in doing this? There aren't any compatibility issues, so it seems a bit pointless to add a new revision for this minor layout change.